August 7, 2008
It has started. Last year it was all MySpace in Perth, but I’ve started overhearing conversations about Facebook on the street and seeing kids using it on the computers at school. Then this morning, while looking for info on their super gross breakfasts for a top secret project, I found out that Hungry Jack’s (the Australian name for Burger King) is advertising it’s Facebook page on its website.
It’s still not as crazy as Toronto, but my gut feeling is that it won’t ever be. The way people use the internet here and the way people socialize just isn’t as compatible with the Facebook way of doing things. I have to think about the specifics more, but I think it has a lot to do with using mobiles (Perth) over the internet on a desktop computer and having lots and of cheap internet access in every home (Toronto). And, as Alex Leitch brilliantly pointed out, Toronto is already divided up in a networky way - with a bunch of very distinct neighbourhood nodes linked together by an excellent transit system. Torontonians are already thinking in a Facebooky way.
Tags: academic, facebook, thesis, australia, perth
5 comments | Leave a comment | Permalink
July 27, 2007
perth had its first ever barcamp last month.
con wiebrands (the ass-kicking curtin librarian who helped convince the evil tech admins to unblock twitter and facebook on campus) and i did a talk on explaining web 2.0 to n00bs, such as older folks or university admin who think the internet is full of pedophiles and hackers.
there were a lot more education/librarian people than i expected, which was cool for getting a more broad range of views. i have, however, found that perth seems to have a lot of little pockets of people doing cool stuff but they tend to keep it to themselves. there isn’t as much cross-pollination as there should be.
the last session was entitled silicon beach (get it? huh huh? like silicon valley… but better cuz theres a beach) which was all about putting perth on the map and overcoming the interia that keeps perth quiet. this was where the microsoft guy, scott barnes, who had come to demo silverlight, revealed that he was also there to sniff out the cool shit going on in perth. he diplomatically told us that we still have a bit of work to do.
but you know what? i think the problem of the little pockets of cool that don’t talk to each other is the real problem. there is cool stuff starting to happen in perth, it’s just hard to find. in the past two weeks, i’ve discovered there were a bunch of killer festivals going on in the next few months, my favourite of which being the byte me! festival of digital geek creativity in december, which has an incredible lineup of VJs, game designers, electronic musicians and thinkers from perth and around the world.
Tags: byteme, barcampperth, web2.0, australia, perth
2 comments | Leave a comment | Permalink
June 25, 2007
the first ever barcamp perth is this weekend, and i’m pretty excited. i’ve been totally deprived of web 2.0ness for the past few months. i even signed up to do a talk on introducing web 2.0 to nongeeks. i’m going to draw on my experiences introducing the living platform and openpolitics.ca to non-techies and training ict4d people for telecentre.org.
red bull is supplying free beverages, which im also very excited about. microsoft has also picked up the afterparty bar tab and other expenses, so the day is now free. i’m all about free entry so everyone can attend and free beers with nerds, but i’m not sure how i feel about microsoft sponsoring barcamp. its kinda like nike sponsoring a conference about good labour practices. but yeah, sweatshops are far more evil than bad software and questionable business practices.
Tags: microsoft, barcampperth, redbull, barcamp, australia, perth
13 comments | Leave a comment | Permalink
May 21, 2007
the other day, i went to a workshop for phd students. no one was sitting there on their laptops half listening while they blogged or looked at web comics. everyone was sitting attentively, making notes on paper, with pens!
i told this story to luke last night. i was telling him about how perth has not yet been taken over web 2.0 craziness that is going on in north america. i’m not talking web 2.0 just in terms of flickr and wikipedia and round corners and crazy colours and folksonomies and all the other usual suspects (they aren’t really big yet here either), but the greater cultural movement surrounding it all. it’s what i can only describe as the web 2.0 hipster culture which i was happily partaking in until i ran away to perth to do my phd. it’s people working at starbucks on their on their black macbooks covered in stickers of web 2.0 and open source brands. its the workaholism, the capitalist leftism and the melding of the gift economy with for-profit enterprises. it’s the the blurring of personal and professional, of leisure and work. it’s having your friends and people you know professionally adding you on facebook. it’s the “unconferences”: barcamp, torcamp, drupalcamp, campcamp, all with 5000 pictures taken with digital slrs complete with the official tag on flickr. 
its the implicit belief running through all this that old power structures are being overturned, that we’re fighting the man. when in reality, old hierarchies and power structures are being reworked and reproduced. web 2.0 brands are the new man.
i have a complicated relationship with web 2.0 (both the tools and the culture). i loved sxsw (which i would argue is the king of all web 2.0 conferences), it was the most amazing week of my life and i met incredible people. i love my macbook with all my stickers and my slr and my flickr account and my livejournal. i’m addicted to checking all my digital hang outs to see if anyone has commented on a photo or added me as a friend. but when i use the term web 2.0, but cringe a little each time. i didn’t really know why before, but now i realise i’m totally complicit not only the left’s overwhelming lack of critical analysis of web 2.0, but an often unquestioning endorsement of its ideologies and brands. sure, the ideology behind web 2.0 is openness, participation, empowering the user, but lest we forget that most web 2.0 services (save wikipedia) are for-profits, and run by either google or yahoo. all good lefties should know the problems that come with big corporations and for-profit orientations. we didn’t like nike for selling us a lifestyle rather than a shoe, which was made in a sweatshop. i articulate my identity with my choice in web 2.0 services and how i use them (and whose stickers i put on my laptop), just like i buy starbucks so i can walk around with the cup looking hip, or nike shoes so i can feel athletic. google has 10 years of my search history and myspace owns my profile. yahoo helped send a chinese journalist to jail. why are we any less angry, or at least less critical? how did we forget all the anti-branding, anti-consumerism, no logo stuff from the 90s? is it because we really are consuming ideas and symbols in the truest sense, rather than physical commodities?
along with these more abstract economic, political and semiotic issues, web 2.0 technology and culture are further facilitating the very real encroachment of work into every other facet of life. being in such a completely different work context of a phd in a city like perth really helped me to see this. at first it annoyed me that i couldn’t get wifi in the cafes and my internet access sucked. it drove me crazy that i actually had to go out in the real world to find stuff, rather than find the information online. and i didn’t like it that no one used upcoming or flickr. but then i realised why this was the case i saw that this lack of 2.0 was actually a really good thing. perth is a really laid back place. people go to cafes to relax, not work, so they don’t care that there’s no wifi. there isn’t even a starbucks here. everything closes around 5 or 6 most days. there are lots of holidays where nothing is open and the few places that are charge a 15% holiday tax because the poor souls who have to work that day have to get paid shitloads for their trouble.
as my friend collette noted, wifi is both a liberator and an enslaver. if its possible to do work anywhere because of wifi, then it becomes expected. if you can do things so much faster because you can just do a search for it online, then you’re expected to do everything quickly. its expected you’ll do so much more everyday. you get 5000 emails instead of talking to people in person or on the phone.
one of the few critiques of web 2.0 culture that i’ve come across is tiziana terranova’s Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy, which offers an amazing analysis of the political economy of web 2.0 (ironically, before the term was even coined), including a discussion of this shift in work culture. she argues that the process of the “social factory” (made popular by the italian autonomists) can be seen in the digital economy - “work processes have shifted from the factory to society, thereby setting in motion a truly complex machine.” this shift was made possible materially and ideologically by the internet (and i would argue, even more by web 2.0):
The expansion of the Internet has given ideological and material support to contemporary trends toward increased flexibility of the workforce, continuous reskilling, freelance work, and the diffusion of practices such as “supplementing” (bringing supplementary work home from the conventional office).
but the worst part, for me at least, is that web 2.0 culture and tools turn leisure into work. the entire web becomes a professional space. there are no boundaries between work and leisure when everyone you work with is using the same services as you. everything you do online becomes peformative. adding photos to flickr, editing your facebook profile, bookmarking something on delicious, updating your blog. all of these things are part of your digital resume. and if you aren’t participating, you’re a nobody.
there’s a glamorization of all this work as leisure too. critiquing don tapscott’s “digital economy,” terranonva offers some insight into why this might be the case:
For Tapscott, therefore, the digital economy magically resolves the contradictions of industrial societies, such as class struggle: while in the industrial economy the “worker tried to achieve fulfillment through leisure [and]… was alienated from the means of production which were owned and controlled by someone else,” in the digital economy the worker achieves fulfillment through work and finds in her brain her own, unalienated means of production.
knowingly or not, i think we’re increasingly finding (or being told to find) fulfillment through work, so we work all the time. if we believe that work is fulfilling, then who needs leisure? this shift in thinking isn’t new, but its being accelerated and magnified by web 2.0 culture and tools which provide both the ideology and the material necessary for work as life. alienated or not, i don’t think this was what marx really had in mind.
this is why i love being back at school here in perth. the web has become a leisure activity again. i don’t feel like i need to spend all my time managing my digital identity. i don’t get 5000 emails a day or have work conversations on msn in the middle of the night. my leisure time is my own. i have the space and the time to think and digest and live.
but, as i was telling all this to luke, i looked at upcoming and saw that perth’s first barcamp is happening in june. and my heart sank. my little refuge will soon no longer be. but im going, of course. i can only hope that we can do web 2.0 hipsterdom here with a good healthy dose of perth culture.
Tags: web2.0, web 2.0, curtin, thesis, australia, barcamp, perth
9 comments | Leave a comment | Permalink
